Hillary is Wallowing in the Dirt by Deliberately Lying About Obama and Ayers

Having been a combat infantry, disabled Vietnam vet, and also, one of the first VVets to come out, in writing, publicly, delcaring we'd lose the Vietnam War in 1967, and then later, being part of the antiwar movement, up to and including the SDS (but not Weather Underground), I think when people began killing other people, and planting bombs, etc., then the "revolution" clearly crossed a different line. I don't know all the deeds of Bill Ayers or Bernadine Dorn. I recall reading somewhere that the univesity Ayers teaches asked him or told him they didn't want him on certain boards because of remarks he made. When September 11 happened, I made comments to former government co workers that we had to accept responsibility for the things we've done to Arabs and Muslims, and our iron clad, without question support for Israel. Ironically, Bush, Sr., actually cut off economic aid to Israel until they ceased building settlements and outposts. His son hadn't the same moral fiber. Regardless of how we've treated Arabs or Muslims, though, I said nothing justified September 11. I was called a "resident Taliban" by a coworker. It was shocking, since we were both Democrats on a life long basis, and both had flirted with Socialism. I've become a moderate Democrat in the face of the Ultra Liberal Elitist (ULE) Obama/DNC attempts to bully and smash Senator Clinton's run for the White House. As often happens, the "vetting" process HAS caught up with Obama. So far, I've not heard what exactly he accomplishd when he traveled in Pakistan. He must have had some real interest in Islam to make that journey. Obamistas had best pray that he did not meet anyone in Pakistan who was or is now, a risk, in terms of links to radical Islamists. That would be the final nail in his coffin, if that were the case. Obama's just an Ultra Liberal ... he's no Marxist, Leninist, Maoist, etc. He's associated with another man who was/is a socialist, but that guy is low level. Nonetheless, neither John McCain nor anyone else will now be able to stop the slide Obama's on towards defeat. He's off his game, and unless he blisters his pastor in the next week, he may lose North Carolina and Indiana. I come from Indiana, and I can say that Rev. Wright's performance will cause many "undecideds", to move away from Obama there. Senator Clinton just had the endorsement of a two term governor in NC. If John Edwards were to endorse her, I suspect Obama will lose that state next week. He will not fare well in Kentucky, West Virginia, possibly Montana and North Dakota. He might be able to pull off Oregon. I doubt Puerto Rico and Guam. So, all of these separate issue distractions could cause his defeat. IF he wants to retain the hope of becoming a Vice President to Clnton, he had BEST NUKE Rev. Wright; detail his associations with Ayers, and, declare any other problems he hasn't told us about. Why? Because now every media person will be digging deeper. Sermons over 20 years will be looked at, and so will Obama's presence in the church for those sermons. Obama, I believe, has peaked. His supporters will "cling" to him because so many have excoriated Clinton so bad they couldn't do anything BUT stay with him. I believe she now has a better chance for the nomination. If he wants to serve on her ticket, he'll have to totally disassociate himself with these people. The fact is, this isn't McCarthyism. McCarthy was NOT lying that there were a number of Communists in the Federal Government. He wasn't lying because there is now ample evidence, gleaned from years of deciphering Russian KGB and GRU messages, by the NSA, that those people WERE in the government and DID pass on vital information to the Russians. If one reads the several books on the Venona Project, you will see just how infiltrated the Communist Party (CPUSA), was. The two books I've read correctly list several hundred, including some very high up in the government. Because Venona transcripts were only released in 1990. however, the McCarthy charges looked like a witchhunt. There is no evidence anyone is doing that now. The greatest danger Obama faces is: Rev. Wright, who is an egomaniac, who might lash back at him, if repudiated totally, and, whether he made any contacts with people in Pakistan who have since become radical Islamists, and have shown up on American intelligence. For the same deep penetration secrecy rules, we may not know that ... but if there WERE a few folks he met while in Pakistan, who are openly and overtly anti-American and radical in their Islamic practices, Obama could be in dramatic trouble. HE may not even know who they are, or if they exist. BUT, his days as a presidential front runner seem in serious jeopardy. He's got some serious problems here. Hillary is a far better candidate, and, a far more accomplished campaigner. She's been right that Senator Obama hasn't been vetted in even a remotely close manner as she has. She's "known," and the growing list of "unknowns" about Obama will cut into his lead. I think if he loses in both states next Tuesday, we could see some Superdelegates shift to Clinton. This could be over quicker than some think. And, since Obama and the world were told by Rev. Wright that he (Wright) will "come after Obama because this government grinds people down ..." he could get into an even crazier distraction with the Rev. The Rev. is totally enamored with himself. He IS, as I have said before, "an actor," on his altar, and he loves the limelight. He has tried to defend himself, but he came across even kookier. If there's more, it WILL now, come out. Obama had best hope Rev. Wright doesn't try and have the last word.
Once Wright is on that type of mission ... no, I will have the last word here ... Obama will never be able to disentangle himself before he loses some more primaries. I think he's peaked and will now begin to falter. We feel good about our support for Clinton. No, this ain't McCarthyism. Not even close.

For those who are interested, Senator Obama disclosed on April 10, 2008, in his famous "small town America and small town Americans ..." that he also was better prepared in the area of foreign policy, because he'd lived in Indonesia, traveled to Kenya (once or twice is now no longer clear), and visited Pakistan, where he was in Jacobabad, under the chaperone of one Mian Muhammadian Soomro. He named several Pakistani friends who went with him; a Pakistani he implied was an "illegal" i.e., he'd overstayed his welcome ... ; also visited Karachi and Hyderabad (India he said). There is also a Hyderabad, Pakistan. Google: "Obama discloses Pakistan visit." "Obama and Muhammadian Soomro." "Muhammadian Soomro and General Pervez Musharraf." "Muhammadian Soomro and PML (Q) Party." "Inter-Services Intelligence Agency, Pakistan." "Stanley Ann Dunham Obama Soetero and USAID." " Same, and Ford Foundation." "USAID as C.I.A. Front Company." "Ford Foundation as C.I.A. Front Company." "Women's Working Bank." "Barack Obama as Marxist." "Stanley Ann Dunham as 'fellow traveler.'" "Obama donates to Fr. Pfleger." And look at the associations Obama has kept. One can learn a lot about one's associates. The aura of McCarthyism is the general indictment of people who were claimed to have been communists. It was unfair. It was also very thickly tarred. There were many Americans who were communists in the 20s and 30s, who were simply communists. They were also seen as allies, in WW II, until the truth began to emerge about their activities against their allies (i.e., the Russian's allies -- i.e. the U.S., the U.K., France, et al). The sins of McCarthy were most disgusting in the way it became a stain to have been a communist. This was because J. Edgar Hoover, deviate that he was, made communists out to be like witches. At the same time, it is possible that Hoover knew, but very few others did, that the VENONA Project was under way, even then. VENONA, which was only declassified in the early 1990s, was an Army Security Agency>> National Security Agency coup, wherein may Soviet KGB and GRU coded transmissions were DE-coded over a lengthy period of time. However, progress was so terrific in the late 1940s, and early 1950s, that the FBI was able to begin identifying a number of C.P.U.S.A. (Communist Party, USA) members WERE ALSO active spies for the Soviet Union. This isn't myth. If J. Edgar ever disclosed the truth to McCarthy (which I doubt), McCarthy was sworn to only the grosser number Hoover gave him of commies in the barn. McCarthy doubtless never knew all the details. Hell, Truman and Eisenhower probably didn't know about VENONA, nor did Kenedy or LBJ, maybe not even Nixon, Carter, or Reagan. The ULTRA secrecy of code breaks is off the chart in what we will do to protect the leak. Because of the ULTRA breaks against the Germans, and the Purple code breaks against the Japanese, we allowed Jews to be killed by Einsatzgruppen in Poland and Russia, and allowed Japanese ships carrying American POWs to be sunk by our subs. This is pretty pathetic. But, VENONA has shown that there was a very significant kernel of truth in how badly penetrated CPUSA was by actual spies for the Soviet Union. Obama's associations bear sensible review. Go through the work suggested above. I would suggest that you will learn that virtually no one has ever heard about a Pakistan trip by Obama until April. I haven't yet found one, although one article suggested a Pakistan Times broke the story. My guess is, the peekers into Obama's State Department files were looking for the trip; State Department Security tipped off Obama; Obama disclosed before it leaked. Prime Minister (government in transition between Benazir Bhutto's assassination and the new government's election) Mian Mohammadian Soomro has so far NOT DISCLOSED a word about the Pakistan trip. Wonder why not? Soomro is allegedly a confidante of Musharraf. The same Musharraf who wanted Soomro appointed. The same Soomro who was seen as a lakey of Musharraf. And, the same Musharraf who Obama has derided. But why, pray tell, would Soomro not discuss the Pakistan trip Obama made in 1981? I really do not know about this, but I've looked. Naysayers should do the same homework. perhaps come forth with new info. The Pakistani bloggers make clear that Pakistan in 1981 was not your typical tourist trap. One suggested that young men went to Pakistan to: get more specific muslim education;
to join the mujahadeen being trained and paid for by Pakistani Inter Services Intelligence (ISI), in cooperation with the United States; Saudi Arabia; Egypt; probably under the surveillance of Indian intelligence operatives; in Pakistan and Afghanistan, to fight against the Soviets; or, to buy dope. Heroin or hash, coming out of Afghanistan. As someone who is constantly being presented as the kick ass winner, Obama has an obligation to now disclose whatever the trip was about. In Richard Wolfe's NEWSWEEK article, "When Barry became Barack," there's no word of this trip. And yet, it's a very flattering and recent snapshot of the Barack Obama story. It says nada about Pakistan. And, it makes clear that when Obama made the trip to Kenya and Indonesia (to see Mum), he was a typical intelligent young man who was biracial; bireligious and areligious; biethnic in some ways; curious about where he should live and how he should live and as what he should live. In other words, a formative period. Out of that, according to the article, emerged African-American Christian Barack Obama. Fine. Why no details on Pakistan?