Visit truthlover's column >>

TRUTHLOVER

Thinking is important but not enough!
Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 11; Links Seeded: 282
Member Since: 3/2008Last Seen: 11/29/2009

US Auto Executives Fly To DC Asking for Taxpayer Money in Private Jets and None Offers to Work for Significantly Less than their 15 or 21 Million Dollar Salaries, Much Less Fly First-Class (why not Business Class?) on a Commericial Airline

advertisement

"There's a delicious irony in seeing private luxury jets flying into Washington, D.C., and people coming off of them with tin cups in their hands," Rep. Gary L. Ackerman (D-N.Y.) advised the pampered executives at a hearing yesterday. "It's almost like seeing a guy show up at the soup kitchen in high-hat and tuxedo. . . . I mean, couldn't you all have downgraded to first class or jet-pooled or something to get here?"

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
61
9.5
5.9
Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3
{"commentId":4136081,"authorDomain":"truthlover"}

This also is especially delicious:

It was hard to feel sorry for the executives when Rep. Peter Roskam (R-Ill.), late in the hearing, reminded them again that "the symbolism of the private jet is difficult," and mischievously asked the witnesses whether, in another symbolic gesture, they would be willing to work for $1 a year, as Nardelli has offered to do.

"I don't have a position on that today," demurred Wagoner (2007 total compensation: $15.7 million).

"I understand the intent, but I think where we are is okay," said Mulally ($21.7 million).

"I'm asking about you," Roskam pressed.

"I think I'm okay where I am," Mulally said.

And don't even think about asking him to fly commercial.

These guys should all be fired with absolutely no golden parachutes. Jeewiz, they could distribute their salaries to the workers they are laying off.  Bums they are.

{"commentId":4136081,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"truthlover"}
  • 25 votes
Reply#1 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 6:16 AM EST
{"commentId":4136513,"authorDomain":"uncleandy"}

Well, they are certainly using poor judgment when it comes to the bailout plan.  As heads of their respective companies, they certainly do not appear to be trying to save anything.   I would think the board of directors and the shareholders may not be very happy with these CEOs at the moment. 

{"commentId":4136513,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"uncleandy"}
  • 11 votes
#1.1 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 8:04 AM EST
{"commentId":4137330,"authorDomain":"alacount"}

I keep asking everyone.....Why are executives that have done a pi $ $ poor job rewarded for doing a pi $ $ poor job, yet the 'workers' are punished and laid off???  If the line workers were doing such a shoddy job, they would be fired.  There needs to be some 'salary caps' put on the management--you know, kinda like they do for the NFL -- give em a fair wage and make em work for it by making their company profitable or fire them completely and start over with some middle management people who would more than likely be just tickled to make a lot less in salary than the existing management

{"commentId":4137330,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"alacount"}
  • 13 votes
#1.2 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 9:31 AM EST
{"commentId":4137438,"authorDomain":"lalaland2013"}

Well, they are certainly using poor judgment when it comes to the bailout plan. 

Poor judgment was letting their companies fall into such disarray in the first place when they're raking in tens of millions a year. What they're doing now is downright offensive and ludricrous.

I would think the board of directors and the shareholders may not be very happy with these CEOs at the moment. 

Agreed, but who cares about them? I'm more concerned about the workers that are losing their jobs in droves so that these jackasses can retain their respective personal wealth. It's shameful. I understand what you're saying though and I admire your ability to be so diplomatic about it. Personally, I'm just livid.

Why are executives that have done a pi $ $ poor job rewarded for doing a pi $ $ poor job, yet the 'workers' are punished and laid off?

You must be new here... Welcome to America LOL. But seriously, I agree with your entire post, mt. This is greed, plain and simple and should not be condoned.

{"commentId":4137438,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"lalaland2013"}
  • 7 votes
#1.3 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 9:40 AM EST
{"commentId":4139127,"authorDomain":"spikegary"}

If there's a bailout, it needs to be with substantial restructuring, with Salary Caps and a lot more common sense, than frankly, the Big 3 have shown in many,many years.  Chrysler was once bailed out (loan from congress) and they restructured and paid the loan back ahead of schedule.  That was in the late 70's early 80's if memory serves.

They need to clean out the current crew, start fresh.  Additionally, the line workers (and the Unions strangling everyone) need to understand that unskilled and semi-skilled labor does not deserve $25 per hour and up-I've heard stories of $70 - $80 per hour AND free health care.  Sorry-it's time to start fresh across the board.

{"commentId":4139127,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"spikegary"}
  • 6 votes
#1.4 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 11:49 AM EST
{"commentId":4139408,"authorDomain":"charnello"}

There needs to be some 'salary caps' put on the management--you know, kinda like they do for the NFL --

Are there salary caps for owners/team executives in the NFL?

{"commentId":4139408,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"charnello"}
  • 2 votes
#1.5 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 12:08 PM EST
{"commentId":4142107,"authorDomain":"JoulesBeef"}

CEO isnt an owner if you come with you hand out we can impose rules.. dont like it.. put your hand back in your own pocket.
these guys also constantly justify their outrageous pay (which was unheard of just a coupel decades ago and yes with inflation) is that they are like super sports stars,, now suddenly they are like sports owners? well which is it..a r they just silver spoons that own a team or are they above average humans super qualified at the job of CEO?

{"commentId":4142107,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"JoulesBeef"}
  • 3 votes
#1.6 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:44 PM EST
{"commentId":4143672,"authorDomain":"jennifer-troupe"}

Does that mean I can get a bailout too if I'm reckless with my money? bailouts for EVERYBODY!!

Isn't there a law in Japan that the highest paid executive can only make so many times more than the lowest paid individuals in the company?  I'm not sure whether that would help or hurt us if we had the same kind of system.

{"commentId":4143672,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"jennifer-troupe"}
  • 3 votes
#1.7 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 4:15 PM EST
{"commentId":4144922,"authorDomain":"terry57"}

they don't need to be fired, just don't give the greedy bastards a freakin dime....

{"commentId":4144922,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"terry57"}
    #1.8 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 5:32 PM EST
    {"commentId":4146881,"authorDomain":"david393071"}

    The only way that I would even consider approving a Loan or Bailout.

    1.  That the Corporate Board Members did everything possible, that includes liquidating their personal National and International Properties (including those hidden under relatives names), and used the money for the Corporation (none for themselves).  This has a precident in what a Private Business Owner must do to save his or her Company.
    If not then send them to a prison like Guantanimo (BO said Guantanimo is closing), It is US Policy not to negotiate during hostage situations with terrorists (3 million US Jobs held hostage by Obese 3 for money), under the Patriot Acts.

    2.  Complete to the penny (.01) public transparency of all money spent.

    3.  Re introduct the technology that was literally crushed by GM, the EV1, electric car with real improvements.

    4.  Back the renewable technologies that have been proven to work (since 1950).  Sugarcane to Ethanol (note: proven that Corn to Ethanol not effective, per US Dept Energy and US Dept Agriculture, UN World Bank). 

    5.  Build the renewable technologies vehicles in the US that do not require a complete change to the infrastructer (trillions USD).  Specifically, like the 3 million E100, and over 6 million Flex Fuel Vehicles (not including the Transportation Vehicles) currently built by GM, Ford, Toyota, VW, Peugot (not in the US).

    6.  Stop putting multimillion USD advertisements on Television, we are not buying what you are saying.

    7.  Defeat NAFTA and CAFTA and bring back ALL the Autoworker Jobs to the US.

    8.  No more building in Mexico and Canada that includes parts.  No preassembly in Mexico and Canada and shipping to Michigan for the installation of one or two bolt or nuts.  No more nuts and bolts from China.  You claim that you are American Corporations, stop being Mexican, Canadian, Chinese.  Any "subcontracting" must be American and meet the same requirements.

    9.  The Obese 3 (GM, Ford, Chrysler) must go to the Banks and Financial Institutions that were Bailed Out before they ask for anything.  If their credit sucks so bad that they cannot obtain loans from the Bailed Out Financial Institutions then that says that no one should bail them out or loan any money.

    10.  No legal loop holes, no excuses, like "well that 30 million USD bonus was planned in 2007"or "well that is how we do business, sending our employees to Spas".

    11.  Default is at Credit Card Interest Rates.  10 to 23 percent interest.  With reposessions (counted at manufacturing cost, not retail).  This includes all Corporate Board Member and Relatives (hidden assets) properties,nationally or internationally.

    {"commentId":4146881,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"david393071"}
    • 3 votes
    #1.9 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 8:03 PM EST
    {"commentId":4150260,"authorDomain":"ladyblue999"}

    The act of flying into Washington on the corporate jets and the condition of the companies they manage is a testament to their complete lack of judgment.

    They should be fired. Their positions should be filled and for substantially less salary. Additionally these positions should be filled by new managers that have displayed a sense of judgment and fair play.

    {"commentId":4150260,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"ladyblue999"}
    • 4 votes
    #1.10 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 2:05 AM EST
    Reply
    {"commentId":4136273,"authorDomain":"anais43"}

    Absolutely time for them to go..without...any and all the perks they have become accustomed to.

    {"commentId":4136273,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"anais43"}
    • 7 votes
    Reply#2 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 7:18 AM EST
    {"commentId":4136382,"authorDomain":"brienamb"}

    I haven't read the article, but I think we are dealing with lots of personality flaws. I think they should given, not offered or asked for pay cuts to equal what their assembly line workers, and retirees had their arms bent behind their backs for.

    If they don't, then let them sink, and let their stockholders deal with them. Its the stockholders that approved these wildly disperportionate salaries. Perhaps if the fold, they will be bought out by Toyota, or even TATA motors, they have much more sense than these idiots.

    In other words, let them fly to hell in their corporate jets!

    {"commentId":4136382,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"brienamb"}
    • 8 votes
    Reply#3 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 7:43 AM EST
    {"commentId":4153037,"authorDomain":"truthlover"}

    It's a short article... worth the read (and the laugh).

    {"commentId":4153037,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"truthlover"}
    • 2 votes
    #3.1 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 10:30 AM EST
    Reply
    {"commentId":4136400,"authorDomain":"leighjohn"}

    Folks, you are in the front row of an even more profound analogy. If you are a Christian and you are informed about judgment day, then think of these executives as satan's emissaries coming to bargain for all the souls in hell to get into heaven by the back door. This is what you are looking at.

    Think of it, here you have these guys saying give us money or we will destroy the lives of over three million people. Isn't this exactly what satan would be saying to God about the billions of souls locked away in hell, and don't forget the misery that God would be inundated with when these souls are made to cry out in pain for added effect.

    I think we should allow the devil to keep his ill gotten gains or losses as the case may be. There is one thing that we should do about the big three and see how they respond and that is challenge them to reveal to the nation the world what they have in R&D that would make them more popular than any one of the top Japanese car manufacturers. if they really have something they would not be coming by private jets with there tin plated gold cups.

    I would like to add that part of why this nation is in this problem and especially this company is that we have kicked innovation to the curb and have aggrandized bean counters. The question i ask, how can one aggrandize bean counters when there are no beans to count? it is a no-brainer to kick these fossils to the curd as they have out served their purposes.

    I think one new growth industry that we need to start looking at is innovations. Suppose instead of R & D being a part of a company like these three former giants,  that you have companies that do straight R & D pitching their innovations to companies. for example if a company designed a new ergonomic car seat that was better than what most cars have they could patent it and pitch it to any and every car company there is. The same of say an engine or even fuel then we would have a situation where instead of cars coming out with new body style every year with little innovation cars could have new internal innovations and the body styling would be the least of the problem. In other words car manufactures have become more fluff than substance and these former giants are the first to succumb to the inevitable.

    So the other companies not just auto manufacturers should see this and realize that they could go the way of these un-evolved fools.

    I would like to end by saying unless these CEO's are kicked to the curb without even their golden parachute and new proven innovative hands-on CEO's hired then this company should be closed and allow the surviving manufacturers to take up the slack. as for the workers and jobs, i am sorry to say that but the must realize that the government would be paying these guys to keep them in clover which would never work as in time the place would still close down only with more debt. we need to get back to brass tacks.

    {"commentId":4136400,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"leighjohn"}
    • 8 votes
    Reply#4 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 7:47 AM EST
    {"commentId":4136438,"authorDomain":"please1234567"}

    I am appalled....

    {"commentId":4136438,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"please1234567"}
    • 5 votes
    Reply#5 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 7:53 AM EST
    {"commentId":4139468,"authorDomain":"jackson-kittilea"}

    That's the word I have been searching for to describe my feelings....Every other word just didn't seem powerful enough

    {"commentId":4139468,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"jackson-kittilea"}
    • 1 vote
    #5.1 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 12:12 PM EST
    Reply
    {"commentId":4136645,"authorDomain":"SharnCedar"}
    Sharn CedarDeleted
    {"commentId":4136794,"authorDomain":"pdeuth"}

    Did you hear Wagoner, and others, say that the problem is all due to the current economic downturn?  He, and others, said that everything would be peachy if only credit was available.  He didn't say credit for whom, the auto buyer, or the corporation.  He was in denial of the last decade, or more, as Toyota and Honda, especially, took market share from his company.  He was in denial of the strategy to make high-margin SUV's, rather than cars that were more suited to our current market and economic conditions.  He went so far as to say that he was making cars people wanted, omitting that fewer and fewer people actually wanted the cars he was making.  It was BS, in other words. 

    It is not possible to improve a business, or a person, without two things: a vision of the future state; and a cold, hard grasp of current reality.  Wagoner indicates that he has neither.  He, and his ilk, have milked Detroit dry, taking from it every last cent they could, leaving ruin in their wakes.  Now he can't stand to face what he has done.  I don't like the man. 

    {"commentId":4136794,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"pdeuth"}
    • 2 votes
    Reply#7 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 8:40 AM EST
    {"commentId":4137029,"authorDomain":"debmark"}

    In the last week, I have heard and read a whole host of people who say throw the workers under the bus because of the management.  The workers are to blame, the management is to blame.  The solution is to take away or lower the salaries because everyone knows that lower wages fix all the problems...so let's do this.

    The Congress and Senate is the CEO's of our country...let's have them work for a $1 a year.  They have ran this country into near bankruptcy with their poor decisions from the war to deregulation.  If they do not agree, then fire them.  No more golden parachutes(full pension and health care after 5 years)

    All government workers make too much money and receive too many benefits.  It is time that the DMV clerks and road workers learn to live like the rest of us.  Let's do away with their pensions because that is why they are not more competitive.  While I feel for them and their families, the country cannot afford their greediness and I am sure we can find cheaper labor to perform their jobs by going to China or India.  There is a better answer than paying these people this high wages.

    The government has not changed with the time, they have not innovated nor were they able to see into the future so let's pull our tax money and see if they can make it on their own.  They will fail or achieve...that's the capitalist way.

    Do you blame the government workforce for the bad decisions made by the Congress and President?  Do you worry about their pay and benefits and since the government is in such debt feel that they should take pay cuts and benefit cuts?  Sure, let's blame the workers and not the management.

    Down with all DMV, road workers, IRS, police, firefighters, military because their greediness is responsible for the state of the country.

    {"commentId":4137029,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"debmark"}
      Reply#8 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 9:04 AM EST
      {"commentId":4153150,"authorDomain":"truthlover"}

      I've gotta disagree with your statement:

      Down with all DMV, road workers, IRS, police, firefighters, military because their greediness is responsible for the state of the country.

      The average worker is just doing what he or she has to do.  DMV workers, road workers, IRS employees, police, and firefighters--all work because they either are supplying a public service or because they need to make money to support themselves or their families OR both.  If you want to find greed, find it in the managers who didn't innovate better vehicles because it would not necessarily reflect on them in the two years after the decision OR on the corporate smucks who turned up at the hearing and were comfortable making ten to sixteen million dollars a year salary.

      {"commentId":4153150,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"truthlover"}
      • 1 vote
      #8.1 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 10:37 AM EST
      Reply
      {"commentId":4137135,"authorDomain":"sgsteitler"}

      You want to talk of corporate waste? Too many companies throw time away at staff meetings trying to come up with great sounding mission statements- One that you know will never be fulfilled! They should have been spending time improving the bottom line. My dad shook his head at this in his day, now I have in mine!

      {"commentId":4137135,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"sgsteitler"}
      • 1 vote
      Reply#9 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 9:16 AM EST
      {"commentId":4137148,"authorDomain":"usfreedomfighter"}

      In America, I didn't think the boards would pay you several million dollars a year plus benefits, including fringes like access to private jets, just to run the shareholders corporations down into the ground - and then get bailed out by the taxpayers.

      I guess I was wrong. Maybe this is not America, maybe it's Russia or some European socio-economic country. I simply woke up another place this morning. Yeah, that's gotta be it...

      {"commentId":4137148,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"usfreedomfighter"}
      • 5 votes
      Reply#10 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 9:18 AM EST
      {"commentId":4150604,"authorDomain":"taainorth"}

      While I was a member of the UAW, I was intrigued by the number of times I heard people say, "it's the job of the union chairman to get an individuals job back after they have been fired." Often times I saw that to be reality. The Chairman may have to negotiate with the company, give up on grievences, and the like, but if a deal was reached, the person got their job back. That was the union chairmans job, to fight the company to insure the workers were protected. Likewise, it is the CEO's job to run the company, create a business plan, and follow the business plan. So the executives at Ford, Chrysler, and GM are doing what they get paid to do. Make money anyway they can for the shareholders and keep the company afloat. I think that the Big 3 have been greedy for years. The 3 companies are now transparent, and the world has gotten a first hand look into what has been happening for years. If the Big 3 are this bad, I can only imagine how bad the oil industry is looking? I am sure many CEO's in Big corporations are planning their escapes before they are found out too.

      Just Say No to the Bailout. It's time the Big 3 and the UAW realize the glory days of golden contracts and big company profits are over. The housing market and the credit crunch are not to blame for the auto industry collapse. When you point your finger, 3 are pointing back at you. 

      {"commentId":4150604,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"taainorth"}
        #10.1 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 4:35 AM EST
        Reply
        {"commentId":4137171,"authorDomain":"ezeques"}
        ezequesDeleted
        {"commentId":4137183,"authorDomain":"phillips-brian"}

        They are not GM. They are rented suits. Fire them and the bloated boards and get some new blood in there that doesn't owe their first born to big oil.

        Greed is a helluva drug!

        {"commentId":4137183,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"phillips-brian"}
        • 3 votes
        Reply#12 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 9:20 AM EST
        {"commentId":4137266,"authorDomain":"james-27"}

        Have you read Romney's comment?. Very interesting.  From the NY Times Wednesday.


        November 19, 2008
        Op-Ed Contributor
        Let Detroit Go Bankrupt
        By MITT ROMNEY

        Boston

        IF get the bailout that their chief executives asked for yesterday, you can kiss the American automotive industry goodbye. It won’t go overnight, but its demise will be virtually guaranteed.

        Without that bailout, Detroit will need to drastically restructure itself. With it, the automakers will stay the course — the suicidal course of declining market shares, insurmountable labor and retiree burdens, technology atrophy, product inferiority and never-ending job losses. Detroit needs a turnaround, not a check.

        I love cars, American cars. I was born in Detroit, the son of an auto chief executive. In 1954, my dad, George Romney, was tapped to run American Motors when its president suddenly died. The company itself was on life support — banks were threatening to deal it a death blow. The stock collapsed. I watched Dad work to turn the company around — and years later at business school, they were still talking about it. From the lessons of that turnaround, and from my own experiences, I have several prescriptions for Detroit’s automakers.

        First, their huge disadvantage in costs relative to foreign brands must be eliminated. That means new labor agreements to align pay and benefits to match those of workers at competitors like . Furthermore, retiree benefits must be reduced so that the total burden per auto for domestic makers is not higher than that of foreign producers.

        That extra burden is estimated to be more than $2,000 per car. Think what that means: Ford, for example, needs to cut $2,000 worth of features and quality out of its Taurus to compete with Toyota’s Avalon. Of course the Avalon feels like a better product — it has $2,000 more put into it. Considering this disadvantage, Detroit has done a remarkable job of designing and engineering its cars. But if this cost penalty persists, any bailout will only delay the inevitable.

        Second, management as is must go. New faces should be recruited from unrelated industries — from companies widely respected for excellence in marketing, innovation, creativity and labor relations.

        The new management must work with labor leaders to see that the enmity between labor and management comes to an end. This division is a holdover from the early years of the last century, when unions brought workers job security and better wages and benefits. But as Walter Reuther, the former head of the , said to my father, “Getting more and more pay for less and less work is a dead-end street.”

        You don’t have to look far for industries with unions that went down that road. Companies in the 21st century cannot perpetuate the destructive labor relations of the 20th. This will mean a new direction for the U.A.W., profit sharing or stock grants to all employees and a change in Big Three management culture.

        The need for collaboration will mean accepting sanity in salaries and perks. At American Motors, my dad cut his pay and that of his executive team, he bought stock in the company, and he went out to factories to talk to workers directly. Get rid of the planes, the executive dining rooms — all the symbols that breed resentment among the hundreds of thousands who will also be sacrificing to keep the companies afloat.

        Investments must be made for the future. No more focus on quarterly earnings or the kind of short-term stock appreciation that means quick riches for executives with options. Manage with an eye on cash flow, balance sheets and long-term appreciation. Invest in truly competitive products and innovative technologies — especially fuel-saving designs — that may not arrive for years. Starving research and development is like eating the seed corn.

        Just as important to the future of American carmakers is the sales force. When sales are down, you don’t want to lose the only people who can get them to grow. So don’t fire the best dealers, and don’t crush them with new financial or performance demands they can’t meet.

        It is not wrong to ask for government help, but the automakers should come up with a win-win proposition. I believe the federal government should invest substantially more in basic research — on new energy sources, fuel-economy technology, materials science and the like — that will ultimately benefit the automotive industry, along with many others. I believe Washington should raise energy research spending to $20 billion a year, from the $4 billion that is spent today. The research could be done at universities, at research labs and even through public-private collaboration. The federal government should also rectify the imbedded tax penalties that favor foreign carmakers.

        But don’t ask Washington to give shareholders and bondholders a free pass — they bet on management and they lost.

        The American auto industry is vital to our national interest as an employer and as a hub for manufacturing. A managed bankruptcy may be the only path to the fundamental restructuring the industry needs. It would permit the companies to shed excess labor, pension and real estate costs. The federal government should provide guarantees for post-bankruptcy financing and assure car buyers that their warranties are not at risk.

        In a managed bankruptcy, the federal government would propel newly competitive and viable automakers, rather than seal their fate with a bailout check.

        Mitt Romney, the former governor of Massachusetts, was a candidate for this year’s Republican presidential nomination.

        {"commentId":4137266,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"james-27"}
        • 2 votes
        Reply#13 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 9:26 AM EST
        {"commentId":4139274,"authorDomain":"spikegary"}

        My sentiments exactly.  Everyone needs to learn that crazy isn't reality, even though, for many, they've never known anything besides crazy.

        {"commentId":4139274,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"spikegary"}
        • 2 votes
        #13.1 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 11:59 AM EST
        {"commentId":4143220,"authorDomain":"danny-soapbox"}

        Notice ole Mitt (like Carly Fiorina...et al...) has NO beef with an egregiously paid upper managment...he says REPLACE them...not demand they "survive" on say...half mill a year?

        How do you change a business CULTURE that says the CEO (and many of his or her cronies in mgt.) are WORTH 342 times more per annum than the salary of the average worker?

        If any of you have THAT answer, you're well on your way to solving the economic crisis we now face.

        {"commentId":4143220,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"danny-soapbox"}
        • 3 votes
        #13.2 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 3:49 PM EST
        {"commentId":4153735,"authorDomain":"truthlover"}

        Nice point, Pittsburgh Dan.  Romney cuddles with upper management and so coddles them.  There should be, by law, a ratio of the top salaries compared to the bottom salaries.  One suggestion in the literature is 20 to 1 as the maximum.  The lowest salaries include everyone: janitors, etc.  20 to 1 is way enough, don't you agree?

        {"commentId":4153735,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"truthlover"}
        • 3 votes
        #13.3 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 11:12 AM EST
        Reply
        {"commentId":4137279,"authorDomain":"susibv"}

        Don't you know that flying commercial is just so Classe Moyenne? Puh-leeze.

        What self-respecting, multi-millionaire-bordering-on-billionaire would subject themselves, their wives, mistresses, children, and pals to commercial airlines these days?

        I mean really people......the wife of a CEO just cant jump in her Bentley and drive herself to the local mall to shop she has to jump in the Leer and go to Pairs, New York, Milan, London, Japan.

        How are us groudlings balk at this.

        {"commentId":4137279,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"susibv"}
        • 1 vote
        Reply#14 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 9:27 AM EST
        {"commentId":4137285,"authorDomain":"zoomzoooooooom"}

        The big 3 are no better that the financial institutions. The pan handle the government for our tax dollars to assist them with selling us inferior products and the banks that are still raising the fees and gouging us at every turn with our own money, and want more of our money to do it with. The line should be drawn in the sand.

        {"commentId":4137285,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"zoomzoooooooom"}
          Reply#15 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 9:28 AM EST
          {"commentId":4137286,"authorDomain":"crystal-plummer"}

          The solution seems simple to me.  Fire the executives, period.  Then bail out the auto workers... not the industry.  Then let's retool the factories to build automobiles that are safe and efficient thereby putting people back to work. 

          {"commentId":4137286,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"crystal-plummer"}
          • 7 votes
          Reply#16 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 9:28 AM EST
          {"commentId":4153762,"authorDomain":"truthlover"}

          Sounds good to me!

          {"commentId":4153762,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"truthlover"}
          • 3 votes
          #16.1 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 11:14 AM EST
          Reply
          {"commentId":4137622,"authorDomain":"caesar-munene"}

          The whole issue of a bailout may prove to be more complicated than just handing out funds to the manufacturers. I read this article and it stopped me in my tracks. Have a peek...

          http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/18/business/economy/18car.html?scp=1&sq=leyland&st=cse

          Are we throwing good money after bad?

          {"commentId":4137622,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"caesar-munene"}
          • 1 vote
          Reply#17 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 9:57 AM EST
          {"commentId":4137887,"authorDomain":"j--rafol"}

          This is what is so wrong with corporate America, abuse in excess and waste in difficult times. Just like the AIG people, they partied after they were handed the check. Let them go broke and file Chapter 11, the court will decide their fate.

          {"commentId":4137887,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"j--rafol"}
          • 1 vote
          Reply#18 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 10:20 AM EST
          {"commentId":4138320,"authorDomain":"brienamb"}

          It is corporate executive greed that is has this country teetereing on ruin. Will America survive, yes she will, will we come out of this at some point, yes we will. But will many millions of lives suffer and come to an end, yes they will.

          Corporate greed, the lust to be the biggest, the baddest, and the most exploitive has seen the export of multi-millions of American jobs, the explosive cost of fuel, the crash of the housing marke, and the leadership on capitol hill has been fascilitating this through these companies PAC organzations kickback schemes. We have a government for sale.

          AIG in particular should be signaled out, why were they bailed out? Would their fall have dominoed as predicted, did Bear Sterns? What will happen when GM and Ford fail? Millions own these cars, and depend on their company service sector? What about their employees who will also be pushed out in to the jobless sector?

          We cannot take anymore of the multi-million dollar salaries from CEOs for doing nothing, ignoring trends, pushing cost ineffective gas guzzling cars, and other products down peoples throats while ignoring the signs of limited resourcs and environment. This country is about to crash, I blame it on the long running governemen who was supposed to protect the public interest. Nevermind that the Democrats were in office 8 years ago, the Republicans had their chance and blew it as if the money supply was monopoly and could be manipulated at will, with the American consumer and tax payer footing every bill.

          Now with a new government fixing to come into power, its time to make sure accountability standards are in place, who is watching the watchers? Obama must not be elected to a second term if his policies prove failures over the next 4 years, however he deserves an opportunity now.

          {"commentId":4138320,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"brienamb"}
          • 4 votes
          Reply#19 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 10:54 AM EST
          {"commentId":4143986,"authorDomain":"havens11"}

          worldcurmudgeon___We have a government for sale? I'll tell you we have the best government money can buy.

          {"commentId":4143986,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"havens11"}
          • 2 votes
          #19.1 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 4:34 PM EST
          {"commentId":4153892,"authorDomain":"truthlover"}

          Yup, the book's title is "The Best Democracy Money Can Buy."

          {"commentId":4153892,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"truthlover"}
          • 3 votes
          #19.2 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 11:22 AM EST
          {"commentId":4161324,"authorDomain":"brienamb"}

          After the book, we will have a Hollywood movie. The plot could be the auctioning off of America piece by piece. We could start with Big Bend National Park, I bet Mexico would be interested in that. Afterward, some collector may be interested in the Smithsonian. Lincoln's Memorial could be turned into a restaurant. All kids of things could come of this.

          {"commentId":4161324,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"brienamb"}
          • 1 vote
          #19.3 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 7:41 PM EST
          {"commentId":4162127,"authorDomain":"ostrichstealth"}

          "who is watching the watchers?"

          You mean like....Dr Manhatten and Night Owl?

          {"commentId":4162127,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"ostrichstealth"}
          • 1 vote
          #19.4 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 9:07 PM EST
          {"commentId":4162474,"authorDomain":"brienamb"}

          I like the DareDevil, actually.

          {"commentId":4162474,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"brienamb"}
          • 1 vote
          #19.5 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 9:45 PM EST
          Reply
          {"commentId":4138573,"authorDomain":"paulpeg1"}

          What most Americans don`t seem to understand is this is the message that they have brain washed into people. We are worth it but you aren`t! You don`t need a union, we will take care of you! Well after we are done helping ourselves!

          Failing that we will take the jobs overseas to help ourselves! To Mexico to help ourselves! Stagnant wages? No healthcare? No clue why? Because too many have been helping themselves!

          I saw that one of the auto companies issued a statement it was corporate policy for security reasons for them to fly on their private jets.  But a Senator (Joe Biden) can ride public trasportation from Washington to his home in Delaware?

          One of the reason Washington is like it is, too many politicians want to be like and listen to these people.

          {"commentId":4138573,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"paulpeg1"}
          • 3 votes
          Reply#20 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 11:10 AM EST
          {"commentId":4138584,"authorDomain":"tory-decker"}

          If you really want to stick it to Big Business, we all need to pull together and stop buying! Do we really need that new car in the garage? Do we really need that 50 inch flat screen tv on the wall? Don't buy into their "easy credit ripoffs". We need to get back to basics folks.

          {"commentId":4138584,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"tory-decker"}
          • 3 votes
          Reply#21 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 11:11 AM EST
          {"commentId":4139199,"authorDomain":"paulpeg1"}

          Clapping! Haven`t bought a new car since 1980, I don`t have any flat screen TV`s and have bought any TV`s in 8 years or so.

          One credit card, bust out in case of emergency. If I can`t scratch a check for it or pay cash I don`t need it. Wallet is supposed to be an entrance not an exit.

          Mortgage crisis? Not for me, priorities, I need a roof over my head more than junk, and mine is paid for. Too many bought junk! Feed the evil machine!

          LOL they need our money more than we need them!

          Sales tax? a misnomer? shouldn`t it be Purchase tax? The people selling it don`t pay the tax! I save 6 1/2 percent of the price everytime I don`t buy!

          {"commentId":4139199,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"paulpeg1"}
          • 1 vote
          #21.1 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 11:54 AM EST
          {"commentId":4139470,"authorDomain":"tory-decker"}

          Paul,

          Exactly my point. They need us, more than we need them. I am in the same boat as you. I don't have any credit cards BY CHOICE. I do have a student loan and house payment, but I am in the black.

          {"commentId":4139470,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"tory-decker"}
            #21.2 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 12:12 PM EST
            {"commentId":4142758,"authorDomain":"paulpeg1"}

            USMC I had to go to PA.  for a funeral when I was like 36-37. I couldn`t get a hotel reservation because I didn`t have a credit card. They didn`t want to hear I paid cash?

            Wife made me go out and get one, we didn`t stay at any of the hotels that refused me! Their loss, certainly not mine.

            Just a simple man and I can find enough things to keep me occupied, don`t need a lot of bling to do it. Busy hands are happy hands!

            {"commentId":4142758,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"paulpeg1"}
              #21.3 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 3:22 PM EST
              Reply
              {"commentId":4138760,"authorDomain":"tishamauro"}

              How do the AIG executives get from place to place?  I bet they don't fly commercial.  We spent over $100 billion on saving AIG and that was a give away not a loan. 

              The automakers are asking for a loan.  I agree that they have been poorly managed but I also think that it would be absolutely crazy tp let them fail.  There are way too many jobs at stake.  I say fire the CEO's and give them the loan they are asking for. 

              Chapter 11 is not a viable option.  GM, Ford, and Chrysler do not make sweaters, they make cars, with long term warranties.  Nobody will have any faith in a car with a 100,000 mile warranty from a company that is in bankruptcy.

              America needs to build cars.  We need to keep the jobs that we have.  I read yesterday that Canada is going to help them.  They haven't disclosed how much yet but I can't believe that Canada is ahead of us on this.  We should be ashamed of ourselves.  Taking the risk of putting milions of people in the unemployment line in the middle of a recession is the dumbest thing that I have ever heard.

              {"commentId":4138760,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"tishamauro"}
              • 1 vote
              Reply#22 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 11:22 AM EST
              {"commentId":4139332,"authorDomain":"paulpeg1"}

              Taking the risk of putting millions of people in the unemployment line in the middle of a recession is the dumbest thing that I have ever heard.

              While I tend to agree with most of your statement, the so called Free Trade agreements that got us to this point easily beat it! But congress was on board for that fiasco too! Maybe they should have ridden with them on the planes back?

              {"commentId":4139332,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"paulpeg1"}
              • 1 vote
              #22.1 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 12:02 PM EST
              {"commentId":4139397,"authorDomain":"tishamauro"}

              I agree with that point also.  That is a topic that is not brought up often enough.  "Fair" trade is what we need. There are many to blame in this mess just like the failure of the financial system. 

              We need to stop the bleeding.  We cannot allow millions more americans to join the unemployment line.  If the Big 3 fail, say hello to the next great depression.

              {"commentId":4139397,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"tishamauro"}
              • 1 vote
              #22.2 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 12:07 PM EST
              {"commentId":4141933,"authorDomain":"brienamb"}

              The problem is not helping, its the absolute chutzpa the CEOs have in refusing to give up perks, take pay cuts, reduce spending on the administrative side, etc. And, go begging to Congress for handouts.

              AIG did this, got the handouts, and immediately rewarded themselves with lavish vacations on taxpayer dollars. Now, they are still in the black, and AIG is headed to Asia to beg for more, which I suppose will be followed with more personal lavish spending.

              No, car workers don't need to be on the dole, they need to stay on the assembly line. To do this car makers need to do their job, even if it means melting down their current overstocked inventory and start over on cars we can really use.

              {"commentId":4141933,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"brienamb"}
              • 2 votes
              #22.3 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:32 PM EST
              {"commentId":4142008,"authorDomain":"tishamauro"}

              I agree.  Everyone should be making sacrafices to keep the wheels from falling off.  CEO's  all the way down to the assembly line need to do what is necessary.  I do believe that GM has been making changes the last few years to start heading in the right direction.  They just haven't been doing enough fast enough.  I think the CEO's of GM need to be replaced.  New ideas and quicker results are needed.  But at the end of the day GM, Ford, and Chrysler need to keep their doors open. 

              {"commentId":4142008,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"tishamauro"}
              • 2 votes
              #22.4 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:37 PM EST
              {"commentId":4142178,"authorDomain":"JoulesBeef"}

              lol ok they are on th verge of bankrupcty and want a "loan" you know thats one way the economy collapsed? bad credit people gttign loans they shouldnt get.. this is also alow interest gov backed loan.. not exactly what most of us call a loan.

              {"commentId":4142178,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"JoulesBeef"}
              • 1 vote
              #22.5 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:47 PM EST
              {"commentId":4154145,"authorDomain":"truthlover"}

              Back to your major point about NAFTA, GATT and free trade.  Congress was NOT ON BOARD... these terrible policies passed Congress by one or maybe two votes... Dashe was set against them...  the ONLY reason they passed was because BILL CLINTON twisted enough arms of Democrats... it would NEVER had passed if Bush were president... you can thank Clinton for this mess.

              {"commentId":4154145,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"truthlover"}
              • 1 vote
              #22.6 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 11:40 AM EST
              {"commentId":4162572,"authorDomain":"brienamb"}

              Congress, in the quest for personal largress, has sanctioned and blessed every major merger that has come along for the past twenty years. Infact, they have passed legislation to assure just that.

              When the final two oil companies merged, Exxon and Mobile, they created the very country our turn of the century politicians were trying to prevent when they divided Standard Oil into two companies for 'owning the market', just these same two. Exxon and Mobile was Standard oil, but their names have changed to protect themselves.

              Now that that has happened, where did the price of oil go, straight to near $150 a barrel, and a hard hit on our economy. When the savings and loan crisis hit home, also over home loans, we should have learned our lesson. What was learned was that if you have a bundle of crap, and you roll it up in a pretty little ball, wrap it in a nice looking paper display, you can sell this loser to anyone in the world, which is what happened. The result of this was the current home crisis on top of the oil farce.

              The number of politicians taking bribes has exploded, and the service they perform in the name of the people is poor at best. Yet, as happened in the case of the Washington DC mayor, the Alaskan Senator, and many more; they get reelected as if the voters are saying they don't care if they are being stolen blind.

              CEOs of these companies need to go, without golden parachuits, without perks, without bonuses, and the boards of directors have to start being responsible to share holders, these are public companies and have a huge impact on our country, of course we all know that.

              {"commentId":4162572,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"brienamb"}
              • 1 vote
              #22.7 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 9:54 PM EST
              Reply
              {"commentId":4139125,"authorDomain":"brywrigh"}

              The question becames can America afford the big three to fail at this historic economic time?

              {"commentId":4139125,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"brywrigh"}
              • 2 votes
              Reply#23 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 11:49 AM EST
              {"commentId":4142967,"authorDomain":"paulpeg1"}

              That itself may be the true question, millions more out of work will have a "trickle down" effect. Those payrolls taken out of consumer spending, spending on unemployment, providing health care, loss of tax revenues to cities, states, and the fed.

              While I don`t like the idea of any of these bailouts, the idea is to stop something worse than a recession.

              The execs of all these companies just seem extremely arrogant, because nobody has told them No in the past.

              Again, none should be making more than a senator. Their sole job seems self promotion.

              {"commentId":4142967,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"paulpeg1"}
                #23.1 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 3:34 PM EST
                {"commentId":4143037,"authorDomain":"tishamauro"}

                I agree.  The CEO's are arrogant and do the companies a disservice by showing up to the hearings in thier individual private jets but we can't take our eyes off the ball.  JOBS   JOBS   JOBS   JOBS   that should become our new mantra.  We need jobs and lots of them.  We cannot afford lose anymore.  We need to create MORE jobs not axe the ones we already have.

                {"commentId":4143037,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"tishamauro"}
                  #23.2 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 3:39 PM EST
                  {"commentId":4154174,"authorDomain":"truthlover"}

                  Yes... in fact, we can't afford not to force them to re-tool.  We COULD and SHOULD support the workers during this period.  We SHOULD NOT support the managers and CEOs that got the companies into this fix.

                  {"commentId":4154174,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"truthlover"}
                  • 3 votes
                  #23.3 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 11:42 AM EST
                  Reply
                  {"commentId":4139196,"authorDomain":"anthopos"}

                  If you think that was outrageous, check this out.

                  Ford CEO Mulally's corporate jet is a perk included for both he and his wife as part of his employment contract along with a $28 million salary last year. Mulally actually lives in Seattle, not Detroit. The company jet takes him home and back on weekends.   http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/WallStreet/story?id=6285739&page=1

                  That would come to about $40,000 every week.

                  {"commentId":4139196,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"anthopos"}
                    Reply#24 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 11:54 AM EST
                    {"commentId":4139321,"authorDomain":"ezeques"}
                    ezequesDeleted
                    {"commentId":4139330,"authorDomain":"mdave"}

                    All I can say is DUMB and DUMBER. If AIG executives were dumb enough to celebrate bailout by treating themselves and spending half a million dollars, these three proved to be dumber because they wasted money by flying chartered planes before even they were considered for bailout. No clue how these people become CEOs.

                    {"commentId":4139330,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"mdave"}
                      Reply#26 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 12:02 PM EST
                      {"commentId":4139365,"authorDomain":"ezeques"}
                      ezequesDeleted
                      {"commentId":4140106,"authorDomain":"alienlife"}

                       I recieved this as an e-mail...How about this...I will support your company by buying another one of your products in the future if you can scrape your own sh*t off the ground.  I already gave you $22,000.  If you used it to fly in your private jet and not to keep your company running, too bad.  I also have a GM mastercard (many years)...what did you do with the money from that...I was never late on payment.

                      Please read the part where they have made it easy for me to contact my senators and represenatives on their behalf.  Take the dollar deal...and I may consider a loan!!!  What did you think???  I am not part of "we the people" you are begging for the loan?.............................................................................

                      Dear.....

                      You made the right choice when you put your confidence in General Motors, and we appreciate your past support. I want to assure you that we are making our best vehicles ever, and we have exciting plans for the future. But we need your help now. Simply put, we need you to join us to let Congress know that a bridge loan to help U.S. automakers also helps strengthen the U.S. economy and preserve millions of American jobs.

                      Despite what you may be hearing, we are not asking Congress for a bailout but rather a loan that will be repaid.

                      The U.S. economy is at a crossroads due to the worldwide credit crisis, and all Americans are feeling the effects of the worst economic downturn in 75 years. Despite our successful efforts to restructure, reduce costs and enhance liquidity, U.S. auto sales rely on access to credit, which is all but frozen through traditional channels.

                      The consequences of the domestic auto industry collapsing would far exceed the $25 billion loan needed to bridge the current crisis. According to a recent study by the Center for Automotive Research:

                      • One in 10 American jobs depends on U.S. automakers
                      • Nearly 3 million jobs are at immediate risk
                      • U.S. personal income could be reduced by $150 billion
                      • The tax revenue lost over 3 years would be more than $156 billion

                      Discussions are now underway in Washington, D.C., concerning loans to support U.S. carmakers. I am asking for your support in this vital effort by contacting your state representatives.

                      Please take a few minutes to go to , where we have made it easy for you to contact .your U.S. senators and representatives Just click on the "I'm a Concerned American" link under the "Mobilize Now" section, and enter your name and ZIP code to send a personalized e-mail stating your support for the U.S. automotive industry.

                      Let me assure you that General Motors has made dramatic improvements over the last 10 years. In fact, we are leading the industry with award-winning vehicles like the Chevrolet Malibu, Cadillac CTS, Buick Enclave, Pontiac G8, GMC Acadia, Chevy Tahoe Hybrid, Saturn AURA and more. We offer 18 models with an EPA estimated 30 MPG highway or better — more than Toyota or Honda. GM has 6 hybrids in market and 3 more by mid-2009. GM has closed the quality gap with the imports, and today we are putting our best quality vehicles on the road.

                      Please share this information with friends and family using the link on the site.

                      Thank you for helping keep our economy viable.

                      Sincerely,



                      Troy Clarke


                      This is an email advertisement. If you prefer not to receive any unsolicited marketing emails regarding GM vehicles, .

                      The marks of General Motors, its divisions, slogans, emblems, vehicle model names, vehicle body designs and other marks appearing in this email are the trademarks and/or service marks of General Motors Corporation, its subsidiaries, affiliates or licensors. ©2008 GM Corp. Buckle up, America!

                      General Motors Corporation
                      100 Renaissance Center
                      482-A00-MAR
                      Detroit, MI 48265

                      {"commentId":4140106,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"alienlife"}
                      • 1 vote
                      Reply#28 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 12:54 PM EST
                      {"commentId":4141997,"authorDomain":"ezeques"}
                      ezequesDeleted
                      Reply
                      {"commentId":4140324,"authorDomain":"alienlife"}

                      I must add a P.S. to my post...I love my GM truck and the dealership (people) I purchased it from are very good to me...treat them well...they are part of the reason I bought my truck.  Get over your greed and find a solution. 

                      {"commentId":4140324,"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414","authorDomain":"alienlife"}
                        Reply#29 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:09 PM EST
                        Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3
                        {"canLink":false,"threadId":"423879","isPrivate":false}
                        Leave a Comment:
                        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                        {"threadId":"423879","contentId":"2131414"}
                        Start TrackingStart Tracking
                        Stop TrackingStop Tracking